summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/drivers
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2025-11-19drm/xe/query: Use scope-based forcewakeMatt Roper
Use scope-based forcewake handling for consistency with other parts of the driver. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-47-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/huc: Use scope-based forcewakeMatt Roper
Use scope-based forcewake in the HuC code for a small simplification and consistency with other parts of the driver. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-46-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/gt_debugfs: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM to simplify the debugfs code slightly. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-45-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/drm_client: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM. v2: - Use xe_force_wake_release_only rather than a custom one-off class for "any engine" forcewake. (Gustavo) Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-44-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe: Return forcewake reference type from force_wake_get_any_engine()Matt Roper
Adjust the signature of force_wake_get_any_engine() such that it returns a 'struct xe_force_wake_ref' rather than a boolean success/failure. Failure cases are now recognized by inspecting the hardware engine returned by reference; a NULL hwe indicates that no engine's forcewake could be obtained. These changes will make it cleaner and easier to incorporate scope-based cleanup in force_wake_get_any_engine()'s caller in a future patch. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-43-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/display: Use scoped-cleanupMatt Roper
Eliminate some goto-based cleanup by utilizing scoped cleanup helpers. v2: - Eliminate unnecessary 'ret' variable in intel_hdcp_gsc_check_status() (Gustavo) Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-42-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/devcoredump: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM in the devcoredump code. This eliminates some goto-based error handling and slightly simplifies other functions. v2: - Move the forcewake acquisition slightly higher in devcoredump_snapshot() so that we maintain an easy-to-understand LIFO cleanup order. (Gustavo) Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-41-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/device: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Convert device code to use scope-based forcewake and runtime PM. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-40-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/gsc: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM to eliminate some goto-based error handling and simplify other functions. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-39-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/pxp: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime pm. This allows us to eliminate some goto-based error handling and simplify other functions. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-38-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/pat: Use scope-based forcewakeMatt Roper
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake in the PAT code to slightly simplify the code. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-37-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/mocs: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Using scope-based cleanup for runtime PM and forcewake in the MOCS code allows us to eliminate some goto-based error handling and simplify some other functions. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-36-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/guc_pc: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM in the GuC PC code. This allows us to eliminate to goto-based cleanup and simplifies some other functions. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-35-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/guc: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Use scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM. Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-34-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/gt_idle: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Use scope-based cleanup for runtime PM and forcewake in the GT idle code. v2: - Use scoped_guard() over guard() in idle_status_show() and idle_residency_ms_show(). (Gustavo) - Eliminate unnecessary 'ret' local variable in name_show(). Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-33-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/gt: Use scope-based cleanupMatt Roper
Using scope-based cleanup for forcewake and runtime PM allows us to reduce or eliminate some of the goto-based error handling and simplify several functions. v2: - Drop changes to do_gt_restart(). This function still has goto-based logic, making scope-based cleanup unsafe for now. (Gustavo) Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-32-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/pm: Add scope-based cleanup helper for runtime PMMatt Roper
Add a scope-based helpers for runtime PM that may be used to simplify cleanup logic and potentially avoid goto-based cleanup. For example, using guard(xe_pm_runtime)(xe); will get runtime PM and cause a corresponding put to occur automatically when the current scope is exited. 'xe_pm_runtime_noresume' can be used as a guard replacement for the corresponding 'noresume' variant. There's also an xe_pm_runtime_ioctl conditional guard that can be used as a replacement for xe_runtime_ioctl(): ACQUIRE(xe_pm_runtime_ioctl, pm)(xe); if ((ret = ACQUIRE_ERR(xe_pm_runtime_ioctl, &pm)) < 0) /* failed */ In a few rare cases (such as gt_reset_worker()) we need to ensure that runtime PM is dropped when the function is exited by any means (including error paths), but the function does not need to acquire runtime PM because that has already been done earlier by a different function. For these special cases, an 'xe_pm_runtime_release_only' guard can be used to handle the release without doing an acquisition. These guards will be used in future patches to eliminate some of our goto-based cleanup. v2: - Specify success condition for xe_pm runtime_ioctl as _RET >= 0 so that positive values will be properly identified as success and trigger destructor cleanup properly. v3: - Add comments to the kerneldoc for the existing 'get' functions indicating that scope-based handling should be preferred where possible. (Gustavo) Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-31-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19drm/xe/forcewake: Add scope-based cleanup for forcewakeMatt Roper
Since forcewake uses a reference counting get/put model, there are many places where we need to be careful to drop the forcewake reference when bailing out of a function early on an error path. Add scope-based cleanup options that can be used in place of explicit get/put to help prevent mistakes in this area. Examples: CLASS(xe_force_wake, fw_ref)(gt_to_fw(gt), XE_FW_GT); Obtain forcewake on the XE_FW_GT domain and hold it until the end of the current block. The wakeref will be dropped automatically when the current scope is exited by any means (return, break, reaching the end of the block, etc.). xe_with_force_wake(fw_ref, gt_to_fw(ss->gt), XE_FORCEWAKE_ALL) { ... } Hold all forcewake domains for the following block. As with the CLASS usage, forcewake will be dropped automatically when the block is exited by any means. Use of these cleanup helpers should allow us to remove some ugly goto-based error handling and help avoid mistakes in functions with lots of early error exits. An 'xe_force_wake_release_only' class is also added for cases where a forcewake reference is passed in from another function and the current function is responsible for releasing it in every flow and error path. v2: - Create a separate constructor that just wraps xe_force_wake_get for use in the class. This eliminates the need to update the signature of xe_force_wake_get(). (Michal) v3: - Wrap xe_with_force_wake's 'done' marker in __UNIQUE_ID. (Gustavo) - Add a note to xe_force_wake_get()'s kerneldoc explaining that scope-based cleanup is preferred when possible. (Gustavo) - Add an xe_force_wake_release_only class. (Gustavo) v4: - Add NULL check on fw in release_only variant. (Gustavo) Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251118164338.3572146-30-matthew.d.roper@intel.com Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
2025-11-19wifi: ath12k: move firmware stats request outside of atomic contextBaochen Qiang
In ath12k_mac_op_link_sta_statistics(), the atomic context scope introduced by dp_lock also covers firmware stats request. Since that request could block, below issue is hit: BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:575 in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 6866, name: iw preempt_count: 201, expected: 0 RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0 3 locks held by iw/6866: #0:[...] #1:[...] #2: ffff9748f43230c8 (&dp->dp_lock){+.-.}-{3:3}, at: ath12k_mac_op_link_sta_statistics+0xc6/0x380 [ath12k] Preemption disabled at: [<ffffffffc0349656>] ath12k_mac_op_link_sta_statistics+0xc6/0x380 [ath12k] Call Trace: <TASK> show_stack dump_stack_lvl dump_stack __might_resched.cold __might_sleep __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested ath12k_mac_get_fw_stats ath12k_mac_op_link_sta_statistics </TASK> Since firmware stats request doesn't require protection from dp_lock, move it outside to fix this issue. While moving, also refine that code hunk to make function parameters get populated when really necessary. Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00302-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.115823.3 Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <baochen.qiang@oss.qualcomm.com> Reviewed-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanthakumar.thiagarajan@oss.qualcomm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251119-ath12k-ng-sleep-in-atomic-v1-1-5d1a726597db@oss.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>
2025-11-19wifi: ath12k: add the missing RCU lock in ath12k_dp_tx_free_txbuf()Baochen Qiang
RCU read lock is missing in ath12k_dp_tx_free_txbuf() before calling ath12k_dp_to_pdev_dp(), causing below warning: WARNING: suspicious RCU usage ----------------------------- drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/dp.h:653 ath12k dp to dp pdev called without rcu lock! Call Trace: <IRQ> show_stack dump_stack_lvl dump_stack lockdep_rcu_suspicious.cold ath12k_dp_tx_free_txbuf ath12k_wifi7_dp_tx_completion_handler ath12k_wifi7_dp_service_srng ath12k_pci_ext_grp_napi_poll [...] </IRQ> Invoke guard(rcu) to fix it. Tested-on: WCN7850 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HMT.1.1.c5-00302-QCAHMTSWPL_V1.0_V2.0_SILICONZ-1.115823.3 Signed-off-by: Baochen Qiang <baochen.qiang@oss.qualcomm.com> Reviewed-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vasanthakumar.thiagarajan@oss.qualcomm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251119-ath12k-fix-missing-rcu-lock-v1-1-8155de1dc4fc@oss.qualcomm.com Signed-off-by: Jeff Johnson <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add kunit tests for props_mismatch()James Morse
When features are mismatched between MSC the way features are combined to the class determines whether resctrl can support this SoC. Add some tests to illustrate the sort of thing that is expected to work, and those that must be removed. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add kunit test for bitmap resetJames Morse
The bitmap reset code has been a source of bugs. Add a unit test. This currently has to be built in, as the rest of the driver is builtin. Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add helper to reset saved mbwu stateJames Morse
resctrl expects to reset the bandwidth counters when the filesystem is mounted. To allow this, add a helper that clears the saved mbwu state. Instead of cross calling to each CPU that can access the component MSC to write to the counter, set a flag that causes it to be zero'd on the the next read. This is easily done by forcing a configuration update. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvdia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Use long MBWU counters if supportedRohit Mathew
Now that the larger counter sizes are probed, make use of them. Callers of mpam_msmon_read() may not know (or care!) about the different counter sizes. Allow them to specify mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu and have the driver pick the counter to use. Only 32bit accesses to the MSC are required to be supported by the spec, but these registers are 64bits. The lower half may overflow into the higher half between two 32bit reads. To avoid this, use a helper that reads the top half multiple times to check for overflow. Signed-off-by: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com> [morse: merged multiple patches from Rohit, added explicit counter selection ] Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu countersRohit Mathew
mpam v0.1 and versions above v1.0 support optional long counter for memory bandwidth monitoring. The MPAMF_MBWUMON_IDR register has fields indicating support for long counters. Probe these feature bits. The mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu feature is used to indicate that bandwidth monitors are supported, instead of muddling this with which size of bandwidth monitors, add an explicit 31 bit counter feature. Signed-off-by: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com> [ morse: Added 31bit counter feature to simplify later logic ] Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Consider overflow in bandwidth counter stateBen Horgan
Use the overflow status bit to track overflow on each bandwidth counter read and add the counter size to the correction when overflow is detected. This assumes that only a single overflow has occurred since the last read of the counter. Overflow interrupts, on hardware that supports them could be used to remove this limitation. Cc: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Track bandwidth counter state for power managementJames Morse
Bandwidth counters need to run continuously to correctly reflect the bandwidth. Save the counter state when the hardware is reset due to CPU hotplug. Add struct mbwu_state to track the bandwidth counter. Support for tracking overflow with the same structure will be added in a subsequent commit. Cc: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add mpam_msmon_read() to read monitor valueJames Morse
Reading a monitor involves configuring what you want to monitor, and reading the value. Components made up of multiple MSC may need values from each MSC. MSCs may take time to configure, returning 'not ready'. The maximum 'not ready' time should have been provided by firmware. Add mpam_msmon_read() to hide all this. If (one of) the MSC returns not ready, then wait the full timeout value before trying again. CC: Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com> Cc: Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add helpers to allocate monitorsJames Morse
MPAM's MSC support a number of monitors, each of which supports bandwidth counters, or cache-storage-utilisation counters. To use a counter, a monitor needs to be configured. Add helpers to allocate and free CSU or MBWU monitors. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Probe and reset the rest of the featuresJames Morse
MPAM supports more features than are going to be exposed to resctrl. For partid other than 0, the reset values of these controls isn't known. Discover the rest of the features so they can be reset to avoid any side effects when resctrl is in use. PARTID narrowing allows MSC/RIS to support less configuration space than is usable. If this feature is found on a class of device we are likely to use, then reduce the partid_max to make it usable. This allows us to map a PARTID to itself. CC: Rohit Mathew <Rohit.Mathew@arm.com> CC: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> CC: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Allow configuration to be applied and restored during cpu onlineJames Morse
When CPUs come online the MSC's original configuration should be restored. Add struct mpam_config to hold the configuration. For each component, this has a bitmap of features that have been changed from the reset values. The mpam_config is also used on RIS reset where all bits are set to ensure all features are reset. Once the maximum partid is known, allocate a configuration array for each component, and reprogram each RIS configuration from this. CC: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Cc: Fujitsu Fujitsu <Shaopeng Tan tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com> Cc: Peter Newman peternewman@google.com Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Use a static key to indicate when mpam is enabledJames Morse
Once all the MSC have been probed, the system wide usable number of PARTID is known and the configuration arrays can be allocated. After this point, checking all the MSC have been probed is pointless, and the cpuhp callbacks should restore the configuration, instead of just resetting the MSC. Add a static key to enable this behaviour. This will also allow MPAM to be disabled in response to an error, and the architecture code to enable/disable the context switch of the MPAM system registers. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Register and enable IRQsJames Morse
Register and enable error IRQs. All the MPAM error interrupts indicate a software bug, e.g. out of range partid. If the error interrupt is ever signalled, attempt to disable MPAM. Only the irq handler accesses the MPAMF_ESR register, so no locking is needed. The work to disable MPAM after an error needs to happen at process context as it takes mutex. It also unregisters the interrupts, meaning it can't be done from the threaded part of a threaded interrupt. Instead, mpam_disable() gets scheduled. Enabling the IRQs in the MSC may involve cross calling to a CPU that can access the MSC. Once the IRQ is requested, the mpam_disable() path can be called asynchronously, which will walk structures sized by max_partid. Ensure this size is fixed before the interrupt is requested. CC: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Rohit Mathew <rohit.mathew@arm.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Extend reset logic to allow devices to be reset any timeJames Morse
cpuhp callbacks aren't the only time the MSC configuration may need to be reset. Resctrl has an API call to reset a class. If an MPAM error interrupt arrives it indicates the driver has misprogrammed an MSC. The safest thing to do is reset all the MSCs and disable MPAM. Add a helper to reset RIS via their class. Call this from mpam_disable(), which can be scheduled from the error interrupt handler. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add a helper to touch an MSC from any CPUJames Morse
Resetting RIS entries from the cpuhp callback is easy as the callback occurs on the correct CPU. This won't be true for any other caller that wants to reset or configure an MSC. Add a helper that schedules the provided function if necessary. Callers should take the cpuhp lock to prevent the cpuhp callbacks from changing the MSC state. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Reset MSC controls from cpuhp callbacksJames Morse
When a CPU comes online, it may bring a newly accessible MSC with it. Only the default partid has its value reset by hardware, and even then the MSC might not have been reset since its config was previously dirtied. e.g. Kexec. Any in-use partid must have its configuration restored, or reset. In-use partids may be held in caches and evicted later. MSC are also reset when CPUs are taken offline to cover cases where firmware doesn't reset the MSC over reboot using UEFI, or kexec where there is no firmware involvement. If the configuration for a RIS has not been touched since it was brought online, it does not need resetting again. To reset, write the maximum values for all discovered controls. CC: Rohit Mathew <Rohit.Mathew@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Merge supported features during mpam_enable() into mpam_classJames Morse
To make a decision about whether to expose an mpam class as a resctrl resource we need to know its overall supported features and properties. Once we've probed all the resources, we can walk the tree and produce overall values by merging the bitmaps. This eliminates features that are only supported by some MSC that make up a component or class. If bitmap properties are mismatched within a component we cannot support the mismatched feature. Care has to be taken as vMSC may hold mismatched RIS. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supportsJames Morse
Expand the probing support with the control and monitor types we can use with resctrl. CC: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add helpers for managing the locking around the mon_sel registersJames Morse
The MSC MON_SEL register needs to be accessed from hardirq for the overflow interrupt, and when taking an IPI to access these registers on platforms where MSC are not accessible from every CPU. This makes an irqsave spinlock the obvious lock to protect these registers. On systems with SCMI or PCC mailboxes it must be able to sleep, meaning a mutex must be used. The SCMI or PCC platforms can't support an overflow interrupt, and can't access the registers from hardirq context. Clearly these two can't exist for one MSC at the same time. Add helpers for the MON_SEL locking. For now, use a irqsave spinlock and only support 'real' MMIO platforms. In the future this lock will be split in two allowing SCMI/PCC platforms to take a mutex. Because there are contexts where the SCMI/PCC platforms can't make an access, mpam_mon_sel_lock() needs to be able to fail. Do this now, so that all the error handling on these paths is present. This allows the relevant paths to fail if they are needed on a platform where this isn't possible, instead of having to make explicit checks of the interface type. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Probe hardware to find the supported partid/pmg valuesJames Morse
CPUs can generate traffic with a range of PARTID and PMG values, but each MSC may also have its own maximum size for these fields. Before MPAM can be used, the driver needs to probe each RIS on each MSC, to find the system-wide smallest value that can be used. The limits from requestors (e.g. CPUs) also need taking into account. While doing this, RIS entries that firmware didn't describe are created under MPAM_CLASS_UNKNOWN. This adds the low level MSC write accessors. While we're here, implement the mpam_register_requestor() call for the arch code to register the CPU limits. Future callers of this will tell us about the SMMU and ITS. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add cpuhp callbacks to probe MSC hardwareJames Morse
Because an MSC can only by accessed from the CPUs in its cpu-affinity set we need to be running on one of those CPUs to probe the MSC hardware. Do this work in the cpuhp callback. Probing the hardware will only happen before MPAM is enabled, walk all the MSCs and probe those we can reach that haven't already been probed as each CPU's online call is made. This adds the low-level MSC register read accessors. Once all MSCs reported by the firmware have been probed from a CPU in their respective cpu-affinity set, the probe-time cpuhp callbacks are replaced. The replacement callbacks will ultimately need to handle save/restore of the runtime MSC state across power transitions, but for now there is nothing to do in them: so do nothing. The architecture's context switch code will be enabled by a static-key, this can be set by mpam_enable(), but must be done from process context, not a cpuhp callback because both take the cpuhp lock. Whenever a new MSC has been probed, the mpam_enable() work is scheduled to test if all the MSCs have been probed. If probing fails, mpam_disable() is scheduled to unregister the cpuhp callbacks and free memory. CC: Lecopzer Chen <lecopzerc@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add MPAM MSC register layout definitionsJames Morse
Memory Partitioning and Monitoring (MPAM) has memory mapped devices (MSCs) with an identity/configuration page. Add the definitions for these registers as offset within the page(s). Link: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0099/aa/ Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add the class and component structures for firmware described risJames Morse
An MSC is a container of resources, each identified by their RIS index. Some RIS are described by firmware to provide their position in the system. Others are discovered when the driver probes the hardware. To configure a resource it needs to be found by its class, e.g. 'L2'. There are two kinds of grouping, a class is a set of components, which are visible to user-space as there are likely to be multiple instances of the L2 cache. (e.g. one per cluster or package) Add support for creating and destroying structures to allow a hierarchy of resources to be created. Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19arm_mpam: Add probe/remove for mpam msc driver and kbuild boiler plateJames Morse
Probing MPAM is convoluted. MSCs that are integrated with a CPU may only be accessible from those CPUs, and they may not be online. Touching the hardware early is pointless as MPAM can't be used until the system-wide common values for num_partid and num_pmg have been discovered. Start with driver probe/remove and mapping the MSC. Cc: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19ACPI / MPAM: Parse the MPAM tableJames Morse
Add code to parse the arm64 specific MPAM table, looking up the cache level from the PPTT and feeding the end result into the MPAM driver. This happens in two stages. Platform devices are created first for the MSC devices. Once the driver probes it calls acpi_mpam_parse_resources() to discover the RIS entries the MSC contains. For now the MPAM hook mpam_ris_create() is stubbed out, but will update the MPAM driver with optional discovered data about the RIS entries. CC: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Link: https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0065/3-0bet/?lang=en Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19ACPI / PPTT: Add a helper to fill a cpumask from a cache_idJames Morse
MPAM identifies CPUs by the cache_id in the PPTT cache structure. The driver needs to know which CPUs are associated with the cache. The CPUs may not all be online, so cacheinfo does not have the information. Add a helper to pull this information out of the PPTT. CC: Rohit Mathew <Rohit.Mathew@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19ACPI / PPTT: Find cache level by cache-idJames Morse
The MPAM table identifies caches by id. The MPAM driver also wants to know the cache level to determine if the platform is of the shape that can be managed via resctrl. Cacheinfo has this information, but only for CPUs that are online. Waiting for all CPUs to come online is a problem for platforms where CPUs are brought online late by user-space. Add a helper that walks every possible cache, until it finds the one identified by cache-id, then return the level. Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19ACPI / PPTT: Add acpi_pptt_cache_v1_full to use pptt cache as one structureBen Horgan
In actbl2.h, acpi_pptt_cache describes the fields in the original Cache Type Structure. In PPTT table version 3 a new field was added at the end, cache_id. This is described in acpi_pptt_cache_v1 but rather than including all v1 fields it just includes this one. In lieu of this being fixed in acpica, introduce acpi_pptt_cache_v1_full to contain all the fields of the Cache Type Structure . Update the existing code to use this new struct. This simplifies the code and removes a non-standard use of ACPI_ADD_PTR. Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19ACPI / PPTT: Stop acpi_count_levels() expecting callers to clear levelsJames Morse
In acpi_count_levels(), the initial value of *levels passed by the caller is really an implementation detail of acpi_count_levels(), so it is unreasonable to expect the callers of this function to know what to pass in for this parameter. The only sensible initial value is 0, which is what the only upstream caller (acpi_get_cache_info()) passes. Use a local variable for the starting cache level in acpi_count_levels(), and pass the result back to the caller via the function return value. Get rid of the levels parameter, which has no remaining purpose. Fix acpi_get_cache_info() to match. Suggested-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
2025-11-19ACPI / PPTT: Add a helper to fill a cpumask from a processor containerJames Morse
The ACPI MPAM table uses the UID of a processor container specified in the PPTT to indicate the subset of CPUs and cache topology that can access each MPAM System Component (MSC). This information is not directly useful to the kernel. The equivalent cpumask is needed instead. Add a helper to find the processor container by its id, then walk the possible CPUs to fill a cpumask with the CPUs that have this processor container as a parent. CC: Dave Martin <dave.martin@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com> Tested-by: Carl Worth <carl@os.amperecomputing.com> Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com> Tested-by: Zeng Heng <zengheng4@huawei.com> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>